-
Let's take Mr. Heisman trophy Mark Ingram and compare him to Jonathan Dwyer and Anthony Allen:
Ingram: 215 lbs, 4.62 40 yard dash, 1678 yards, 6.1 Avg, 17 TDs Dwyer: 235 lbs, 4.59 40 yard dash, 1395 yards, 7.0 Avg, 12 TDs Allen: 230 lbs, 4.45 40 yard dash, 1316 yards, 5.5 Avg, 7 TDs
I took Ingram & Dwyers numbers from 2009 when they won their awards (Heisman & ACC POTY), and Allen from 2009. All 40 yard dashes are from the NFL combine. Anyway, all are great running backs, wouldn't you agree? Ingram has more yards, but Dwyer's average was better. Funny, I'd say between the three, the difference is marginal.
This post was edited by GT Guy on 7/22/2011 at 6:22 AM
-
GT Guy said...
The point is to do that at every position on the field. Where's our NT version of Mt Cody? What about the linebackers? I'd say we actually had the better QB (system vs system), but if you go look at the 2-deep it won't be a comparison. Now, I'm not saying this to say we can't compete. But we have to be extra vigilant, extra competitive, extra motivated, and better coached.
To use your champagne example, if you are only comparing one bottle of $100 wine vs $50 wine, okay, you could probably be okay with the difference if the rest of your wine cellars were identical. Now, imagine every bottle of wine in your 100 bottle cellar is that difference and which cellar would you pick?
-
Yukonwreck said...
I don't understand the argument here. It is pure fantasy to say Georgia Tech gets, or has ever gotten, comparable talent via recruiting. His Alabama example is ludicrous. The perfect comparison is Chris Jackson. Jackson could not see the field in Tuscaloosa, and when he transferred to Tech he was projected to not only be a starter, but to be an exemplary starter (sic).
You are absolutely right --we can compete but we have a markedly different equation for success. We will never trot out fifty superior athletes compared to our competition. This is just a hunch, but in terms of athletes most years we are closer in overall quality to Duke or even Middle Tennessee than we are to Georgia or FSU.
-
stonedwall said...
on the offensive side of the coin, i could care less about everyone else's perceived talent as long as we are recruiting the kinda boys we need for our system. i think navy has proven you can move the ball and score in this division with essentially FCS sized players and talent on offense as long as the players execute.
however, on the defensive side of the ball, we definitely need our fair share of proven talent and some genuine stars. missing out on tuitt hurt.
if we field a top-10 D and have the consistency and tenacity of the navy O we'll be damn tough to beat. i don't think it's pie in the sky to think we can do this. it won't be the coming season, though!
-
alaguy said...
Field a TOP TEN defense? When have we EVER had a top 10 defense? If we get a top25 defense I'll be estatic because there is nothing to show in past 2 yrs that PJ can put a decent defense on the field.We can give every excuse in the book but the defenses have STUNK.
No matter how much we ignore it there is a good chance that practicing vs our Offense and PLAYERS does HURT our defense.When you have a terrible passing game(bad passers and WRs) you can't get use to playing good pass defense for example- AND that doesn't even get into practicing vs the TO .
so yes it is pie in the sky without a 5 star recruit at DL.LB and DB every yr .
This post was edited by stonedwall on 7/23/2011 at 2:33 AM
-
stonedwall said...
i'll give you this, alaguy. you're really passionate in your posts. but, you're just as delusional, too.
so, we have to recruit at least THREE 5-star defensive players at DL, LB and DB every recruiting class? you must know something we don't know! do you think 5-star defensive athletes grow on trees? saban at AL, richt in athens, tressel at ohio state, notre dame and USC don't even do that year in and out!
guess what? TCU had the best defense in the land last year and hasn't had a 5-star recruit as far as i can ever tell at defense. shoot, they don't have but two or three 4-star defensive recruits over the past 5 or so years.
having a killer D is pie in the sky for EVERYONE across the nation, i suppose, cause nobody recruits as you suggest CPJ would have to do in order to break into the top ten on D. if you're gonna suggest a benchmark CPJ must attain, can you at least use one that's plausible for a human to achieve?
-
stonedwall said...
i don't judge groh on last year's D. and, i believe he knows what he's doing. but, we DO need the necessary pieces to complete the puzzle on this 3-4 defense.
we have GOT to hold our own on the DL. i'm genuinely concerned we'll have issues with our front 3. last year, we got absolutely no pressure on the opposing QB. of course, in part that can be attributable to the new scheme. but, we don't have a proven, "big ugly" at NT and that's vital in the 3-4. there's only so much "coaching up" groh, or anyone else, can do.
-
Yukonwreck said...
I didn't declare him a fraud. I said I had a nagging concern that he might be, and I hoped the hell not. But getting in done in the pros where you go out and get the personnel you need and then show them how to do it, and doing it in college are two vastly different deals. Ask Charlie Weiss. What did you see last year that has got you convinced that we will be lights out on defense this year? I saw "some" improvement, but even that wasn't consistent week-to-week. We still had the same problems late in the year that we showed against Kansas. Many were personnel related, but we have not improved our personnel significantly. We are not about to completely shutdown VPI, Georgia, Clempsen, Miami, or UNC. When we get to that stage, then we'll have something to crow about. I think we are still going to be operating as a team that has to score 30 points a game to have a chance.
-
pckl300 said...
Yes I do. We haven't gotten nearly as many ESPN150 recruits as them; however much you value recruiting services is up to you, but my point is here: Among the BCS conferences, the difference between non-ESPN150 talent and ESPN150 talent is slim. They're picking the best out of the Division I athletes, who are all very elite athletes to begin with. It's like picking one brand of champagne over another. You may get the cheaper bottle, but it's still champagne.
Let's take Mr. Heisman trophy Mark Ingram and compare him to Jonathan Dwyer and Anthony Allen:
Ingram: 215 lbs, 4.62 40 yard dash, 1678 yards, 6.1 Avg, 17 TDs Dwyer: 235 lbs, 4.59 40 yard dash, 1395 yards, 7.0 Avg, 12 TDs Allen: 230 lbs, 4.45 40 yard dash, 1316 yards, 5.5 Avg, 7 TDs
I took Ingram & Dwyers numbers from 2009 when they won their awards (Heisman & ACC POTY), and Allen from 2009. All 40 yard dashes are from the NFL combine. Anyway, all are great running backs, wouldn't you agree? Ingram has more yards, but Dwyer's average was better. Funny, I'd say between the three, the difference is marginal.
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | Refresh

GT = Wake Forest?